Byju's Lenders Left Out: Court Official's Decision Sparks Legal Battle

An Indian court official expelled US lenders from a powerful creditors committee, which was a blow to the group's attempts to recover over $1.2 billion from the bankrupt education technology company Think & Learn Pvt, often known as Byju's. The goal of the legal action against Byju's is to resolve the company's financial issues through insolvency. The creditor's committee is essential to managing the procedure and guaranteeing the protection of all parties involved. The exclusion of American lenders from this group raises questions regarding the fairness of the discussions.

What will be the possible outcome of this move for Byju's?

In its current financial problems, Byju's could close down entirely or undergo a comprehensive restructuring. One possible result is that Byju's can successfully negotiate a debt restructuring with its creditors, enabling the company to carry on as a going concern with a well-defined payback strategy. Alternatively, Byju's might be sold or bought by another company if restructuring isn't practical. This would entail determining its market value and negotiating the terms with possible purchasers. In the worst-case situation, Byju's may have to close its doors and cease operations if it cannot find a long-term solution to its financial problems.

Byju's accused Lenders of secretly plotting to reject their claims.

The decision made by the official in charge of managing Byju's insolvency means that lenders were not allowed to choose the company's next director. At the same time, a repayment plan was being formulated. Byju's Interim Resolution Professional, Pankaj Srivastava, accused the lenders of "secretly plotting to reject" their claims and of rigging the creditors' vote by leaving them out.

In an email statement, lenders claimed that Srivastava called a meeting of the creditor's committee and was chosen as a "permanent resolution professional" before Glas Trust, the lenders' agent, even found out they had been fired. An email sent to Srivastava after Indian business hours received no response. "In the history of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code of India, no interim resolution professional has ever attempted to unlawfully strip financial creditors of claims of this magnitude. Therefore, Pankaj Srivastava's actions are unprecedented and illegitimate," the lenders stated.

For some months, lenders have been attempting, albeit with little success, to compel Byju's to enter into an insolvency case in an Indian court. The Indian Supreme Court is currently debating one aspect of that legal battle.

Is Byju's future uncertain?

For Byju's and its stakeholders, the decision to exclude American lenders from the creditors committee poses several serious difficulties. This is a significant setback for lenders because it lessens their power to influence critical decision-making processes, which may limit their ability to recover their investments. With ongoing bankruptcy procedures among stakeholders harming the company's capacity to restructure its debt and continue operations successfully, Byju's now needs more certainty about its future. Additionally, only some US lenders may cause delays in the insolvency process by increasing the complexity and duration of negotiations.

According to court filings, the lenders in the US have been attempting to locate $533 million that Byju Raveendran, the company's founder, allegedly said was so perfectly hidden that no one would ever uncover it. A US bankruptcy court has filed a fraudulent-transfer action against Byju's. In that situation, Byju's Alpha is a dummy business that Byju's established to access US capital markets. Lenders took control of the shell firm after Byju defaulted, placed it under court protection, and filed a lawsuit to recover $533 million they believe is theirs.

Byju's struck an agreement to resolve the primary bankruptcy lawsuit brought against it by the cricket board of India. The lenders have petitioned the Indian Supreme Court to halt the transaction, claiming funds that were supposed to go to them were inadvertently utilised to settle the cricket board's debt. The court still needs to decide the appeal.

Read More:

Creditors Take Control: Is Byju's Future Uncertain?

Is Byju's Back on Track? A Shocking Turnaround

Will Byju's Bounce Back? Debt Dispute with Could Make or Break Byju’s