Byju's Insolvency Case Twist: Supreme Court Reserves Judgement

On 26 September, the Supreme Court temporarily suspended the Resolution Professional's (RP) scheduled meetings regarding Byju's bankruptcy case. The Court has not yet rendered a final decision in this case. The Supreme Court's decision on 26 September to temporarily halt Resolution Professional's (RP) planned meetings about Byju's bankruptcy case suggests that legal actions are still pending and there are still questions about the company's future.

The ongoing legal challenges surrounding Byju's may worsen

The ongoing legal challenges surrounding Byju's may worsen, with the Supreme Court having the capacity to either sustain or reverse the acts taken by Resolution Professionals (RP). If the RP's debt management plan is accepted, Byju could continue business as usual while attempting to strengthen its financial position. This might lead to additional disagreements between the company, its creditors, and other relevant parties. But if restructuring doesn't work out, Byju's might have to sell or be acquired, which would mean a thorough appraisal and discussions with possible purchasers. In the worst-case situation, the business might be forced into liquidation, which would mean selling its assets and stopping operations.

Byju's assets could not be used as collateral for any payment

As the creditors' representative during the hearing, the Solicitor General set terms for a potential settlement, one of which was that Byju's assets could not be used as collateral for any payment. The Supreme Court questioned whether Regulation 30A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and other existing laws permit a settlement outside the established processes. The investigation also examined the financial records of Byju's parent company, Think & Learn Pvt Ltd. Shyam Divan, the creditors' counsel, highlighted that transparency papers had not been supplied by regulations and claimed a significant loss of Rs 8,104.68 crore as of March 2022. He also brought up problems with Byju's default claims, emphasizing that the company's auditor quit in September 2024, creating doubts about the firm's financial stability.

Byju's power would effectively end if it were put into liquidation

Liquidation is the process of selling off a company's assets to pay off creditors; after this is finished, the business will no longer exist. Byju's, as we know, would cease to exist as a result, which would cause interruptions to educational programs, employment losses, and possible financial losses for investors. Despite controlling 99.18 percent of the firm, Byju's legal team contended that the company had yet to be included in important decisions related to the insolvency process. They pointed to anomalies in how the process was managed and asked for a halt to the insolvency proceedings. The RP has halted all of its sessions to preserve Byju's ongoing fight against insolvency. The lawsuit centers on Byju's continuing bankruptcy proceedings and disagreement with lenders in the United States, who Glas Trust represents.

Conclusion

The payment settlement of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Byju was contested by Glas Trust, who maintained that the Rs 158 crore payment was "tainted" and had been stolen from them. Furthermore, after expulsion from the Committee of Creditors (CoC), Glas Trust filed an appeal by RP Pankaj Srivastava, who determined that Glas Trust no longer satisfied the threshold of representing at least 51% of Byju's creditors. The verdict issued by the Supreme Court will significantly affect Byju's future. It is still being determined if the business will overcome these obstacles and come out of bankruptcy with a workable plan for the future.

Read More:

Byju's Secures Funds: Is Byju's on the Road to Recovery?

Byju's and Aakash Split: Is It Taking Advantage of Byju's Crisis?

SC Challenges Byju's: What is Byju's Survival Plan?

The Impact of Service Suspension on Byju's: Byju's in Trouble